The decrease in draft picks option makes no sense. So, we have someone tanking, and we are DECREASING their ability to compete in the future? How does that make sense? And, what if they leave? Will we re-install the draft picks for the incoming owner? If so, what penalty was served?
I think we need to do something, but this doesn't seem to be a solution. We like to give ourselves advantages (see the poll for keeping status quo on the cut down - I'd guess there's a corralation between those voting status quo there and take away draft picks here).
I voted draft lottery, but that's also because that would be a nice winter diversion.
Again - I would force everyone to pay 1 year in advance of entry fee, and if they leave, they lose it. Then, the penalty of tanking can be removal from the league (and thus, lose next year's entry fee). It would also make it easier finding a new owner for teams in a position to tank - now they only need to pay NEXT year's fee and get a freebie in effect. (I guess they are still paying for a year, but if they understand what we are doing, it would make sense).
I don't see how making bad teams more disadvantaged makes the league better (read: competitive).