| Trade posting | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Knuckleball Commissioner
Number of posts : 716 Age : 38 Location : Granite Bay, CA Registration date : 2008-12-15
| Subject: Trade posting Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:14 pm | |
| This is one for me personally to lessen the Admin tasks, but we don't need trades posted both on this forum and on Fantrax unless bid cash is involved. | |
|
| |
bryanmurphy9
Number of posts : 2458 Age : 37 Location : Middletown, IN Registration date : 2008-01-18
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:39 pm | |
| Yes we do. The forum is a good reference point for past deals. | |
|
| |
bryanmurphy9
Number of posts : 2458 Age : 37 Location : Middletown, IN Registration date : 2008-01-18
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:40 pm | |
| Honestly, if your admin tasks are to much then we need to look into someone that can give more time to your spot as a commish. | |
|
| |
thome52
Number of posts : 1037 Age : 36 Location : Minnesota Registration date : 2014-02-16
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:07 am | |
| I think posting them is fine, but I don't think they need to be confirmed. If something's wrong, obviously they'll post on it, but I don't think we need it to be confrimed. | |
|
| |
smk1363
Number of posts : 1232 Age : 36 Location : Boston, MA Registration date : 2008-01-02
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:42 am | |
| Agree with Thom. One of the involved parties can post the deal, along with it being accepted in Fantrax.
I don't think the other party should need to confirm and I certainly don't think the commish needs to say "Approved" in the thread either.
If a deal is made in error on Fantrax, it will certainly be called out. | |
|
| |
Knuckleball Commissioner
Number of posts : 716 Age : 38 Location : Granite Bay, CA Registration date : 2008-12-15
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:19 pm | |
| - bryanmurphy9 wrote:
- Honestly, if your admin tasks are to much then we need to look into someone that can give more time to your spot as a commish.
Way to be an asshole Bryan | |
|
| |
bryanmurphy9
Number of posts : 2458 Age : 37 Location : Middletown, IN Registration date : 2008-01-18
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:35 pm | |
| - Knuckleball wrote:
- bryanmurphy9 wrote:
- Honestly, if your admin tasks are to much then we need to look into someone that can give more time to your spot as a commish.
Way to be an asshole Bryan While I agree the trades don't need commish posted approval. The trades and archives on forum is a very valuable resource. | |
|
| |
jamcam13 Commissioner
Number of posts : 1256 Age : 53 Location : Nashville Registration date : 2008-01-09
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Sat Feb 21, 2015 11:36 am | |
| - smk1363 wrote:
- Agree with Thom. One of the involved parties can post the deal, along with it being accepted in Fantrax.
I don't think the other party should need to confirm and I certainly don't think the commish needs to say "Approved" in the thread either.
If a deal is made in error on Fantrax, it will certainly be called out. Agree, except I think the 2nd party should come in and agree. I think we can just eliminate the commish approval step. Bryan - if you want I can take this over as well similar to what I've been doing with locking the Mi bidding once you've declared winner. Maybe, we should apply the same here - 1st trade partner posts, 2nd agrees, I lock, done. It can then be re-opened by another commish if something is awry/vetoed/whatever which has never happened. Let me know. EDIT: I should have said ...A commish... not another, as I am not a commissioner, just a forum helper. Just so nobody reads that differently. | |
|
| |
bryanmurphy9
Number of posts : 2458 Age : 37 Location : Middletown, IN Registration date : 2008-01-18
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Sat Feb 21, 2015 11:40 am | |
| That sounds good to me Jammy. This wasn't something I felt needed to be voted on. If we have any other changes like this that are small I'll detail them in a memo sent to the league. | |
|
| |
thome52
Number of posts : 1037 Age : 36 Location : Minnesota Registration date : 2014-02-16
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:41 pm | |
| What do we gain by having someone type I agree? If somethings wrong I'm sure the other party will let everyone know, but we shouldn't waste people's time by making them type I agree. Clearly they agree, that's why it got accepted in the first place. | |
|
| |
bryanmurphy9
Number of posts : 2458 Age : 37 Location : Middletown, IN Registration date : 2008-01-18
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:06 pm | |
| It's more checks and balances than anything. It takes a whole two seconds to type I agree. | |
|
| |
thome52
Number of posts : 1037 Age : 36 Location : Minnesota Registration date : 2014-02-16
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:30 am | |
| Bryan -
You sound like the supervisor at a job, when an employee asks, so why do we do it this way?
Well, we've always done it that way.
- My point is there's always a better way to do stuff, just because it takes two seconds to type I agree, that doesn't mean we need it. | |
|
| |
jamcam13 Commissioner
Number of posts : 1256 Age : 53 Location : Nashville Registration date : 2008-01-09
| Subject: Re: Trade posting Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:53 pm | |
| - thome52 wrote:
- Bryan -
You sound like the supervisor at a job, when an employee asks, so why do we do it this way?
Well, we've always done it that way.
- My point is there's always a better way to do stuff, just because it takes two seconds to type I agree, that doesn't mean we need it. I see it more as in case someone accidentally hits Accept on the other site then scrambles to e-mail/message the person and/or commish. They could easily come here and say - nope. I realize long shot it gets as far as the other person posting here, but given it is in fact 2 seconds and folks should still be checking in here periodically anyway, why not account for that 1 time that will happen and the other person is being a dickhead and says - nope!! He hit accept. Not trying to turn this into buyers remorse, but I could easily see this happening. I've declined trades myself and then said - jeez, I hope I didn't accidentally press accept and check the board. Anyway, I'm not 100% against doing away with it, but I do see a purpose it serves beyond just this is the way it's always been done. As is, we are trying to curtail the need for a commish approval here and on Fantrax. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Trade posting | |
| |
|
| |
| Trade posting | |
|